In times of the COVID-19 pandemic working from home, uncertainty regarding infection and social distancing were considered as the new reality. Literature has shown that such stressful circumstances may not only have a negative impact but may also lead to the experience of positive changes, such as a better appreciation of life. This is called post-traumatic growth (PTG). More knowledge on PTG gives us implications on how to improve psychological adjustment during stressful circumstances.
This dissertation of Denise Blom aims to gain insight into several complex questions in PTG literature regarding the possibility for individual differences in the experience of PTG during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicate that inconsistencies in PTG literature may be due to individual differences in predictors (e.g., appraisal, coping and age) and outcomes of PTG (e.g., well-being). Different pathways exist to experiencing PTG and it does not necessarily mean that people who perceive PTG report a better well-being. Likewise, individuals differ in the amount of positive and negative changes, defined as post-traumatic depreciation (PTD), they experience. An exclusive focus on PTG does not provide a complete picture of post-trauma change.
These results underline the importance of considering individual differences in PTG research and clinical practice. Different interventions could be beneficial for different individuals, asking for a more individualistic approach. Furthermore, including negative changes in PTG interventions could be beneficial in releasing the pressure to be only positive, as a large group of individuals experienced both at the same time.
